Zimbabwe | BCH-NR2-ZW-102631 | Second National Report on the Implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety | Biosafety Clearing-House

Loading...
Second National Report on the Implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (NR2)
  |  
BCH-NR2-ZW-102631-3   |   PDF   |   Print   |  
published: 31 Oct 2011 last updated: 31 Mar 2014
General Information


1. Ministry of Agriculture<br />2. Plant Quarantine Services<br />3. Seed Services<br />4. Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources<br />5. Veterinary Department<br />6. Ministry of Health
EN

01 Oct 2007
01 Oct 2011
Party to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
Article 2 – General provisions
A domestic regulatory framework is fully in place
EN
  • One or more national biosafety laws
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
More than 10
EN
Yes
EN
National biosafety framework&nbsp; has been in place since 1998. In 1998, the Research Act was amended to provide for the management of potentially harmful technologies and undertakings. In 2000, the Research (Biosafety) Regulations were developed and gazetted. National policy on biotechnology and its safe use was developed in 2005. In 2005, the Government through the National Policy on Biotechnology agreed to allocate 0.5% of GDP towards biotechnology research, development, application and regulation. To reinforce the policy framework, a new law establishing the National Biotechnology Authority into place – the National Biotechnology Authority Act&nbsp; [cap. 14.31] of 2006&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ]
EN
Article 5 – Pharmaceuticals
Yes
EN
No
EN
All phamaceuticals are controlled by the Medicines Control Authority of Zimbabwe. They however refer to the NBA requests for new products from GMOs&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
EN
Article 6 – Transit and Contained use
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
n/a
EN
Imports and exports are screened for the presence of LMOs . We have not yet had any case of LMOs transiting through our country.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
EN
Articles 7 to 10 – Advance Informed Agreement (AIA) and intentional introduction of LMOs into the environment
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes, to some extent
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
No
EN
No
EN
None
EN
None
EN
With regard to the intentional introduction of LMOs into the environment , Zimbabwe refers to the National Biotechnology Authority Act of 2006 and guidelines for planned release of LMOs into the environment.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
EN
Article 11 – Procedure for living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (LMOs-FFP)
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
No
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
None
EN
More than 10
EN
More than 10
EN
No
EN
No
EN
LMOS FFPs are handled on a case by case basis to augment national stocks and in emergence situations. The National Biotechnology Authority supervises the handling of all LMOs to ensure that no material enters into the environment.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
EN
Article 12 – Review of decision
Yes
EN
No
EN
No
EN
None
EN
In cases where new evidence is received approval decisions can be reviewed.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
EN
Article 13 – Simplified procedure
Yes
EN
No
EN
None
EN
Article 14 – Bilateral, regional and multilateral agreements and arrangements
No
EN
Even though guidelines are&nbsp; there developed by SADC which are on a voluntary basis. They resemble our own system. There are however links between regulatory agencies in the region. There are also guidelines that are being&nbsp; developed by COMESA though they are not legally binding&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
EN
Article 15 – Risk assessment
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
No
EN
Yes
EN
Yes, always
EN
No
EN
None
EN
Yes, always
EN
Yes, always
EN
LMO FFPs and those LMOs for intentional release into the environment are treated the same because there are chances that LMO FFPs&nbsp; can escape&nbsp; into the environment thus the need to conduct risk assessments for all cases.&nbsp; Risk assessment was done done in 2003 but was overtaken by events.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
EN
Article 16 – Risk management
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
The inspectorate regularly carries out survellinace programmes with the intention of checking for LMOs in imports, exports&nbsp; and harvests. Field trials involving LMOs are also supervised inorder to minimise unintentional introduction of LMOs into the environment.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
EN
Article 17 – Unintentional transboundary movements and emergency measures
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Never
EN
The inpectorate is always on the look out for unintentional transboundary movements&nbsp; of LMOs. LMOs which are illegally imported are milled under the supervision of the National Biotechnology Authority or destroyed.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
EN
Article 18 – Handling, transport, packaging and identification
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Article 19 – Competent National Authorities and National Focal Points
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes, one
EN
Yes, all information
EN
Yes
EN
The national focal point for the Cartagena Protocol is the Ministry of Environment and for the BCH it is the National Biotechnology Authority. The national competent authourity for&nbsp;&nbsp; the Cartagena Protocol is the National Biotechnology Authority.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ]
EN
Article 20 – Information Sharing and the Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)
Information available and in the BCH
EN
Information available and in the BCH
EN
Information not available
EN
Information available and in the BCH
EN
Information available but not in the BCH
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information available and in the BCH
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Information not available
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes, always
EN
No
EN
n/a
EN
Yes
EN
Zimbabwe&nbsp; has successfully completed the BCH project and some of the trained people are now posting information on the BCH website.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
EN
Article 21 – Confidential information
Yes
EN
Yes, always
EN
Article 22 – Capacity-building
Yes
EN
Multilateral channels
EN
Yes
EN
Multilateral channels
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Average
EN
  • Pilot Biosafety Enabling Activity
  • Development of national biosafety frameworks
  • Building Capacity for Effective Participation in the BCH (Phase I)
  • Building Capacity for Effective Participation in the BCH (Phase II)
Yes
EN
  • Institutional capacity
  • Human resources capacity development and training
  • Risk assessment and other scientific and technical expertise
  • Risk management
  • Public awareness, participation and education in biosafety
  • Information exchange and data management including participation in the Biosafety Clearing-House
  • Scientific, technical and institutional collaboration at subregional, regional and international levels
  • Identification of LMOs, including their detection
  • Socio-economic considerations
  • Implementation of the documentation requirements under Article 18.2 of the Protocol
  • Handling of confidential information
  • Measures to address unintentional and/or illegal transboundary movements of LMOs
  • Scientific biosafety research relating to LMOs
  • Taking into account risks to human health
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
  • Institutional capacity
  • Human resources capacity development and training
  • Risk assessment and other scientific and technical expertise
  • Risk management
  • Public awareness, participation and education in biosafety
  • Information exchange and data management including participation in the Biosafety Clearing-House
  • Scientific, technical and institutional collaboration at subregional, regional and international levels
  • Technology transfer
  • Identification of LMOs, including their detection
  • Socio-economic considerations
  • Implementation of the documentation requirements under Article 18.2 of the Protocol
  • Measures to address unintentional and/or illegal transboundary movements of LMOs
  • Scientific biosafety research relating to LMOs
  • Taking into account risks to human health
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
The Government of Zimbabwe has made tremendous efforts in biosafety capacity building. These efforts were complimented by organisations like ICGEB and RAEIN_AFRICA which have assisted in training the country's risk assessors.&nbsp; <br />Zimbabwe has applied to receive funds for Building Capacity for Effective Participation in the BCH (Phase II).&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
EN
Article 23 – Public awareness and participation
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
More than 5
EN
The country is involved in various public awareness activties and information gaps are constantly checked for and addressed.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
EN
Article 24 – Non-Parties
No
EN
No
EN
No
EN
n/a
EN
The country has not entered into any agreement with a non party&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
EN
Article 25 – Illegal transboundary movements
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Never
EN
Officers at ports of entry verify import and export documents. Consignments without the required documentation are held pending submssion of import documents. Samples of consignments are collected and tested for the presence of LMOs. In the event of detection of LMOs consignments are either subjected to supervised milling or destroyed. Permit defaulters are penalised.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;
EN
Article 26 – Socio-economic considerations
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Article 27 – Liability and Redress
No
EN
Yes
EN
Article 33 – Monitoring and reporting
Yes
EN
  • Lack of financial resources to gather the necessary information
Other information
Zimbabwe has made tremendous progress in implementing provisions of the Cartagena Protocol. However financial constraints have hampered efforts to fully implement provisions of the Protocol.&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
EN
Comments on reporting format
Survey on indicators of the Strategic Plan (2014)
2001 or earlier
EN
Additional funds for implementation of the Protocol were sourced from regional and international organisations. However the funds were not enough for effective implementation of the Protocol.
EN
1 per year or more
EN
Zimbabwe through the National Biotechnology Authority has put in place biosafety training programmes. The programmes focus on various biosafety issues such as risk assessment, science communication etc. Though a comprehensive programme is in place it cannot be fully implemented because of financial constraints. Most training programmes are run when the country manages to partner with organisations which offer resources for training such as universities.
EN
Yes
EN
All capacity-building initiatives are coordinated by the National Biotechnology Authority and at times through our other stakeholders such as universities
EN
5,000 USD or more
EN
Yes
EN
The country’s National Competent Authority for the Cartagena Protocol that is the National Biotechnology Authority is a wholly owned government organisation. Thus it is funded by the government. However the resources supplied by government are limited therefore are not enough for building capacity for effective implementation of the Protocol. This is because the country is facing economic challenges.
EN
None
EN
Zimbabwe has not entered into any LMO-related collaborative bilateral/multilateral arrangements. However it is a member of two regional bodies that have come up with guidelines for handling living modified organisms. The regional bodies are the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA). SADC guidelines are implemented on a voluntary basis whilst the COMESA guidelines which are yet to be passed and are thus not legally binding.
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
The country has in place guidance documents for evaluating risk assessment reports submitted by notifiers.
EN
No
EN
Yes
EN
The country has conducted risk assessments for LMOs intended for contained use and for Food, Feed and Processing.
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
The country has developed guidelines for the purposes of handling, transport and packaging of LMOs. However the guidelines need to be revised. Legal provisions for labelling LMOs exists.
EN
Yes
EN
Efforts have been made towards putting in place mechanisms for taking into account socio-economic considerations in LMO decision making. However a lot more work in this regard still needs to be done.
EN
10 or more
EN
The country relies on peer reviewed journal articles and policy documents when making decisions pertaining to socio-economic considerations
EN
To date Zimbabwe has not experienced any challenges in taking into account socio-economic considerations in decision making.
EN
Yes
EN
The country has biosafety officers who regularly carry out LMO surveillance activities. However there is need to increase the staff complement and resources for the work. In addition, a fully functional LMO detecting laboratory exists.
EN
10 or more
EN
10 or more
EN
10 or more
EN
Yes
EN
Infrastructure for monitoring or managing LMOs is rather limited , state of art equipment/infrastructure is required.
EN
Yes
EN
Training material and technical guidance is used whenever training programmes are conducted.
EN
No
EN
No
EN
10 or more
EN
Although the country trained a number of custom officials there are a few trained officers at ports of entry. This is because the country was affected by the brain drain and some custom officials have since left employment for various reasons.
EN
10 or more
EN
Few laboratory personnel has received training in detection of LMOs due to limited resources.
EN
Yes
EN
The country has a fully functional laboratory but its charges for detecting LMOs are prohibitive.
EN
One or more
EN
Only one laboratory is certified for LMO detection.
EN
One or more
EN
only one
EN
No
EN
The country realises the importance of developing capacity to handle liability and redress issues. Zimbabwe is thus is keen to develop the required capacity.
EN
Yes
EN
The National Biotechnology Authority handles all administrative and legal issues pertaining to damage of biological diversity due to living modified organisms.
EN
Yes
EN
Zimbabwe strongly recognises the need for public participation in decision making processes regarding living modified organisms thus makes all efforts to engage the public.
EN
  • National website
  • Newspaper
  • Forums
  • Mailing lists
  • Public hearings
Forums
EN
The country engages the public at activities such as workshops and national exhibitions.
EN
3 or more
EN
In a bid to ensure the effective implementation of the Protocol the Government of Zimbabwe embarked on human resource capacity development since 2006. To date graduates with expertise in the area of biosafety have been trained although the critical mass of skilled personnel is still very thin.
EN
One or more
EN
There is need for development of more biosafety training materials and online modules for effective implementation of the Protocol.
EN
Yes
EN
Yes
EN
One or more
EN
3
EN
10 or more
EN
  • BCH Central Portal
One or more
EN
Yes
EN
the national biotechnology authority is responsible for carrying out programmes at local, national and international level.
EN
Yes
EN
5 or more
EN