| | english | español | français |
Go to record ID

  Home|Finding Information|Record details   Printer-friendly version

Information Resource
Record information and status
Record ID
103396
Status
Published
Date of creation
2012-05-08 18:27 UTC (dina.abdelhakim@cbd.int)
Date of publication
2012-05-08 18:27 UTC (dina.abdelhakim@cbd.int)

General Information
Title
Transgenic Insecticidal Crops and Natural Enemies: A Detailed Review of Laboratory Studies
Author
Gabor L. Lövei, David A. Andow, and Salvatore Arpaia
Author’s contact information
Gabor L. Lövei
E-mail: gabor.lovei@agrsci.dk

Department of Integrated Pest Management
Aarhus University, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences
Flakkebjerg Research Centre
DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark
Language(s)
  • English
Publication date
2009
Subject
Summary, abstract or table of contents
Abstract:

This review uses a data-driven, quantitative method to summarize the published, peer-reviewed literature about the impact of genetically modified (GM) plants on arthropod natural enemies in laboratory experiments. The method is similar to meta-analysis, and, in contrast to a simple author-vote counting method used by several earlier reviews, gives an objective, data-driven summary of existing knowledge about these effects. Significantly more non-neutral responses were observed than expected at random in 75% of the comparisons of natural enemy groups and response classes. These observations indicate that Cry toxins and proteinase inhibitors often have non-neutral effects on natural enemies. This synthesis identifies a continued bias toward studies on a few predator species, especially the green lacewing, Chrysoperla cornea Stephens, which may be more sensitive to GM insecticidal plants (16.8% of the quantified parameter responses were significantly negative) than predators in general (10.9% significantly negative effects without C. cornea). Parasitoids were more susceptible than predators to the effects of both Cry toxins and proteinase inhibitors, with fewer positive effects (18.0%, significant and nonsignificant positive effects combined) than negative ones (66.1%, significant and nonsignificant negative effects combined). GM plants can have a positive effect on natural enemies (4.8% of responses were significantly positive), although significant negative (21.2%) effects were more common. Although there are data on 48 natural enemy species, the database is still far from adequate to predict the effect of a Bt toxin or proteinase inhibitor on natural enemies.
Thematic areas
  • Scientific and technical issues
    • Risk assessment
Background material to the “Guidance on risk assessment of living modified organisms”
Is this document is recommend as background material for the “Guidance on Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms”
Yes
Section(s) of the “Guidance on Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms” this background material is relevant
Additional Information
Type of resource
  • Article (journal / magazine / newspaper)
  • Report / Review / Fact sheet / Notes
Identifier
DOI: 10.1603/022.038.0201
Publisher and its location
Entomological Society of America
Rights
© 2009 Entomological Society of America
Format
14 page PDF
Source
Environmental Entomology
Keywords and any other relevant information
Keywords: transgenic plants, biosafety, natural enemies, laboratory experiments, review

Citation: Environmental Entomology 38(2):293-306. 2009