| | english | español | français |
Go to record ID

  Home|Finding Information|Record details   Printer-friendly version

Information Resource
Record information and status
Record ID
41653
Status
Published
Date of creation
2007-09-02 12:51 UTC (UNEP-GEF/6584)
Date of last update
2012-05-02 19:14 UTC (dina.abdelhakim@cbd.int)
Date of publication
2012-05-07 13:57 UTC (andrew.bowers@cbd.int)

General Information
Title
Debating the Precautionary Principle: "Guilty until Proven Innocent" or "Innocent until Proven Guilty"?
Author
Belt, Henk van den; American Society of Plant Biologists
Organization(s) involved in the publication of this resource
Mr. Henk van den Belt
E-mail henk.vandenbelt@wur.nl
Fax:+31 317 485 453
Language(s)
  • English
Publication date
2003-07-01
Subject
Summary, abstract or table of contents
This paper debates issues associated to the Precautionary Principle.
A review Article with the following headings:
1. The Precautionary Principle.
2. The Logic of Pascals Wager
3. Burdens and Standards of Proof
4. The Future of World Agriculture
Thematic areas
Background material to the “Guidance on risk assessment of living modified organisms”
Is this document is recommend as background material for the “Guidance on Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms”
Yes
Section(s) of the “Guidance on Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms” this background material is relevant
Additional Information
Type of resource
  • Monograph (book, brochures or pamphlet, journal article)
Identifier
ISSN: 1532-2548
Publisher and its location
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLANT BIOLOGISTS
United States of America
Rights
2003 the American Society of Plant Biologists
Format
Paper, Adobe Acrobat Reader (5 pages)
PDF
Source
Plant Physiology; pp. 1122-1126; Volume: 132.
Keywords and any other relevant information
precautionary principle
gmos/lmos
Citation: Plant Physiology July 2003 vol. 132 no. 3 1122-1126