| | english | español | français |
Go to record ID

  Home|Finding Information|Record details   Printer-friendly version

Biosafety Information Resource
Record information and status
Record ID
103525
Status
Published
Date of creation
2012-05-15 13:17 UTC (dina.abdelhakim@cbd.int)
Date of last update
2012-05-25 18:52 UTC (manoela.miranda@cbd.int)

General Information
Title
Scrutinizing the current practice of the environmental risk assessment of GM maize applications for cultivation in the EU
Author
Marion Dolezel, Marianne Miklau, Angelika Hilbeck, Mathias Otto, Michael Eckerstorfer, Andreas Heissenberger, Beatrix Tappeser and Helmut Gaugitsch
Author’s contact information
Marion Dolezel
Email: marion.dolezel@umweltbundesamt.at

Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Spittelauer Laende 5,
1090 Vienna, Austria
Language(s)
  • English
Publication date
2011
Subject
Summary, abstract or table of contents
Abstract:

Purpose: The prevailing controversies on the potential environmental risks of genetically modified organisms [GMOs] still fuel ongoing discussions among European Union [EU] member states, risk assessors, applicants and scientists, even several years after the commercial introduction of GMOs. The disagreements mainly derive from the current risk assessment practice of GMOs and differences in the perceived environmental risks. Against this background, the aim of this study was to scrutinize the current practice of environmental risk assessment [ERA] of several GMO applications currently pending for authorisation in the EU.

Methods: We analysed the data presented for three assessment categories of the ERA of genetically modified [GM] maize applications for cultivation in the European Union: the agronomic evaluations and the assessments of the effects of GM maize on target organisms and of its potential adverse effects on non-target organisms.

Results: Major shortcomings causing considerable uncertainties related to the risk assessment were identified in all three categories. In addition, two principles of Directive 2001/18/EC are largely not fulfilled - the consideration of the receiving environment and the indirect effects, as mediated, e.g. by the application of the complementary herbicide in the case of herbicide-tolerant GM maize.

Conclusions: We conclude that the current practice of ERA does not comprehensively fulfil the scientific and legal requirements of Directive 2001/18/EC, and we propose improvements and needs for further guidance and development of standards. The recommendations address likewise applicants, risk assessors as well as decision makers.
Thematic areas
Background material to the “Guidance on risk assessment of living modified organisms”
Is this document is recommend as background material for the “Guidance on Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms”
Yes
Section(s) of the “Guidance on Risk Assessment of Living Modified Organisms” this background material is relevant
Additional Information
Type of resource
  • Article (journal / magazine / newspaper)
Identifier
doi:10.1186/2190-4715-23-33
Publisher and its location
Springer
Rights
© 2011 Dolezel et al
Format
15 page PDF
Source
Environmental Sciences Europe
Keywords and any other relevant information
Citation: Dolezel et al. Environmental Sciences Europe 2011, 23:33

   
   
Rate this page  - 38 people have rated this page  
United Nations Environment Programme United Nations