| | english | español | français |
  Home|The Cartagena Protocol|Risk Assessment|Training|E-training|Module 3   Printer-friendly version

  • Slide
  • Manual Notes

There can however be problems when selecting an assessment and point and/ or representative species and these must be kept in mind so as to ensure that the risk assessment that is being carried out is accurate and relevant.

Example – Common problems in selecting assessment endpoints
  • Endpoint is a goal (e.g., maintain and restore endemic populations);
  • Endpoint is vague (e.g., estuarine integrity instead of abundance and distribution of a species);
  • Ecological entity may not be as sensitive to the stressor;
  • Ecological entity is not exposed to the stressor (e.g., using insectivorous birds for avian risk of pesticide application to seeds);
  • Ecological entities are irrelevant to the assessment (e.g., lake fish in salmon stream);
  • Importance of a species or attributes of an ecosystem are not fully considered;
  • Attribute is not sufficiently sensitive for detecting important effects (e.g., survival compared with recruitment for endangered species).
Source: US Environmental Protection Agency (1998).