Suriname | BCH-NR4-SR-248628 | Fourth National Report on the Implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

General Information

Country

Suriname

Contact person submitting the report

CHM-NFP-SR-237931-6 National Focal Points Ms. Marci Gompers This document has been updated. This is not the latest published version. Click here to view the latest version of the record.

9. Organizations/stakeholders who were consulted or participated in the preparation of this report

This report has been validated on 21 January 2022 by the Interdepartmental Committee on Biosafety, chaired by the Ministry of Spatial Planning and Environment (ROM). The composition of the Committee is as follows: the Ministry of Spatial Planning and Environment, the National Institute for the Environment and Development (NIMOS), the Ministry of Agriculture, Animals Husbandry and Fisheries, the Anne van Dijk Rice Research Centre Nickerie (ADRON), the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Entrepreneurship and Technological Innovation, the Suriname Bureau of Standards, the Ministry of Health, the Anton de Kom University of Suriname (AdeKUS) and the Centre for Agricultural Research in Suriname (CELOS)

EN

10. Time period covered by this report

From

01 Jan 2016

To

31 Oct 2019

Party to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

11. Is your country a Party to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB)?

Yes

EN

Article 2 – General provisions

Article 2 requires each Party to take the necessary and appropriate legal, administrative and other measures to implement its obligations under the Protocol

14. Has your country introduced the necessary national measures for the implementation of the Protocol?

Only draft measures exist

EN

15. Which specific instruments are in place for the implementation of national biosafety measures? (select all that apply)

No instruments are in place

16. Has your country undertaken initiatives to mainstream biosafety into national biodiversity strategies and action plans, other policies, or legislation?

No

EN

17. Has your country established a mechanism for budget allocations for the operation of its national biosafety measures?

No

EN

18. Does your country have permanent staff to administer functions directly related to biosafety?

Yes

EN

19. If you answered Yes to question 18, how many permanent staff members are in place whose functions are directly related to biosafety ?

1 to 4

EN

Is this number adequate

No

EN

20. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 2 in your country

Suriname has produced a National Biosafety Framework in 2004. In addition, a first draft of biosafety legislation was formulated. The National Biosafety Committee established under the project GEF-Regional Biosafety Project in the Caribbean Region (2012-2016), in short the Regional Biosafety Project, was dismantled after the project had ended. From 2017-2019 a committee for Biotechnology and Biosafety for Food Security and Food Safety was established, which continued to work on the draft biosafety legislation. This renewed document is now still in draft. The draft implementation plan for the National Biosafety Framework in Suriname (2011-2016), created under the Regional Biosafety Project has not been validated. Also, under the Regional Biosafety Project the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Regional Biotechnology & Biosafety Policy 2017 was drafted and is in the consultation phase. The Caribbean Agricultural Health and Food Safety Agency (CAHFSA) is in the process of creating public awareness on this document for implementation. The idea is that the lack of capacity and knowledge in the region on biosafety management will be tackled as a region. The individual countries can of course still formulate their national policies.

EN

Article 5 - Pharmaceuticals

21. Does your country regulate the transboundary movement, handling or use of living modified organisms (LMOs) which are pharmaceuticals to humans?

No

EN

22. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 5 in your country

The necessary regulations are not in place as yet.

EN

Article 6 – Transit and Contained use

23. Does your country regulate the transit of LMOs?

No

EN

24. Does your country regulate the contained use of LMOs?

No

EN

25. Has your country taken a decision concerning the import of LMOs for contained use?

No

EN

26. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 6 in your country

Because the necessary regulations are not in place, these measures can not be implemented

EN

Articles 7 to 10 – Advance Informed Agreement (AIA) and intentional introduction of LMOs into the environment

27. Has your country established legal requirements for exporters under its jurisdiction to notify in writing the competent national authority of the Party of import prior to the intentional transboundary movement of an LMO that falls within the scope of the AIA procedure?

No

EN

28. When acting as the Party of export, has your country established legal requirements for the accuracy of information contained in the notification provided by the exporter?

Not applicable (Party currently not exporting LMOs)

EN

29. In the current reporting period, has your country received a notification regarding intentional transboundary movements of LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment?

No

EN

30. If you answered Yes to question 29, did the notification(s) contain complete information (at a minimum the information specified in Annex I to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety)?

31. If you answered Yes to question 29, has your country acknowledged receipt of the notification(s) to the notifier within ninety days of receipt?

32. If you answered Yes to question 29, has your country informed of its decision(s)

a. The notifier?

b. The Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)?

33. In the current reporting period, has your country taken a decision in response to the notification(s) regarding intentional transboundary movements of LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment?

No

EN

34. If you answered Yes to question 33, how many LMOs has your country approved for import for intentional introduction into the environment?

35. If you answered under question 34 that LMOs were approved, have all these LMOs actually been imported into your country?

36. If you answered Yes to question 33, what percentage of your country’s decisions fall into the following categories? (select all that apply)

37. If you answered under question 36 that your country has taken a decision to approve the import with conditions or to prohibit the import, were the reasons provided?

38. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Articles 7 to 10 in your country, including measures in case of lack of scientific certainty on potential adverse effects of LMOs for intentional introduction to the environment

Because the necessary regulations are not in place, these measures can not be implemented.

EN

Article 11 – Procedure for living modified organisms intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (LMOs-FFP)

39. Does your country have law(s), regulation(s) or administrative measures for decision-making regarding domestic use, including placing on the market, of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing?

No

EN

40. Has your country established legal requirements for the accuracy of information to be provided by the applicant regarding the domestic use, including placing on the market, of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing?

No

EN

41. In the current reporting period, how many decisions has your country taken regarding domestic use, including placing on the market, of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing?

None

EN

42. Does your country have law(s), regulation(s) or administrative measures for decision-making regarding the import of LMOs for direct use as food or feed, or for processing?

No

EN

43. In the current reporting period, how many decisions has your country taken regarding the import of LMOs for direct use as food or feed, or for processing?

None

EN

44. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 11 in your country, including measures in case of lack of scientific certainty on potential adverse effects of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing

Because the necessary regulations are not in place, these measures can not be implemented

EN

Article 12 – Review of decision

45. Has your country established a mechanism for the review and change of a decision regarding an intentional transboundary movement of LMOs?

No

EN

46. In the current reporting period, has your country reviewed and/or changed a decision regarding an intentional transboundary movement of an LMO?

No

EN

47. If you answered Yes to question 46, how many decisions were reviewed and/or changed?

48. If you answered Yes to question 46, were any of the reviews triggered by a request from the Party of export or the notifier?

49. If you answered Yes to question 48, did your country provide a response within ninety days setting out the reasons for the decision?

50. If you answered Yes to question 46, were any of the reviews initiated by your country as the Party of import?

51. If you answered Yes to question 50, did your country, within thirty days, set out the reasons for the decision and inform

a. The notifier

b. The BCH?

52. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 12 in your country

Because the necessary regulations are not in place, these measures can not be implemented.

EN

Article 13 – Simplified procedure

53. Has your country established a mechanism for the application of the simplified procedure regarding an intentional transboundary movement of LMOs?

No

EN

54. In the current reporting period, has your country applied the simplified procedure?

No

EN

55. If you answered Yes to question 54, for how many LMOs has your country applied the simplified procedure?

56. If you answered Yes to question 54, has your country informed the Parties through the BCH of the cases where the simplified procedure was applied?

57. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 13 in your country

Because the necessary regulations are not in place, these measures can not be implemented.

EN

Article 14 – Bilateral, regional and multilateral agreements and arrangements

58. How many bilateral, regional or multilateral agreements or arrangements relevant to biosafety has your country established with other Parties/non-Parties?

10 or more

EN

59. If you answered under question 58 that agreements or arrangements were established, please provide a brief description of their scope and objective

#1 GATT Article XX recognizes the objective of protection of the environment including human, animal, plant life and health (GMOs) #2 SPS Art. 2.1 states the right to take sanitary and phytosanitary measures for protection of human, animal, plant life and health (GMOs) Art. 5.7 gives parties the right to a precautionary approach in risk assessment (GMOs) #3 TBT Art. 2.2 states the right to make technical regulations, standards and conformity assessment procedures for protection of human, animal, plant life and health and the environment (GMOs), thereby promoting the use of science and risk assessment #4 TRIPS Art. 27.2 states that patents can be refused when it might endanger human, animal or plant life and health and the environment, thereby excluding microorganisms, microbial and non- biological processes (GMOs are currently under review). #5 WIPO GMOs are under review for patentability or non-patentability #6 CBD Preamble calls for precautionary approach when decision on import of GMOs is made by a serious threat to the environment regardless of its scientific certainty. Art. 8j. ad-hoc working group on traditional knowledge addresses the handling of biotechnological innovations and distribution of benefits. Art. 8g. states that parties should manage, regulate and control risk associated with the use and release of GMOs. Art. 19.4 states provision of information to other parties on their use and safety regulations on GMOs (Clearing house mechanism) #7 ACT Art. VII.a states that to promote research and prevent and control deceases in the territories #8 CARICOM The CARICOM has taken interest in regional coordination of biosafety and have developed the following policy documents regarding the matter: - CARICOM Biosafety Policy brief 2019 - Biosafety Outlook - CARICOM DRAFT Biosafety Bill #9 Basel Convention GMOs can be considered hazardous waste and thereby fall under the Basel convention #10 IPPC Art. VI.1 states that contracting parties may require phytosanitary measures for quarantine pests and regulated non-quarantine pests. Since GMO may be considered pests, this has a evident link.

EN

60. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 14 in your country

The Republic of Suriname has not signed bilateral, regional or multilateral agreements on biotechnology and biosafety, however under the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) which Suriname is party to a draft regional policy is formulated by CAHFSA, which is in the consultation phase.

EN

Articles 15 & 16 – Risk Assessment and Risk Management

61. Does the domestic regulatory framework of your country require risk assessments of LMOs to be conducted?

No

EN

62. If you answered Yes to question 61, with regard to which LMOs does the requirement apply (select all that apply)?

63. Has your country established a mechanism to conduct risk assessments prior to taking decisions regarding LMOs?

No

EN

64. If you answered Yes to question 63, does the mechanism include procedures to identify and/or train national experts to conduct risk assessments?

Capacity-building in risk assessment or risk management

65. How many people in your country have been trained in risk assessment, risk management and monitoring of LMOs?

a. Risk assessment

10 to 49

EN

Is this number adequate

No

EN

b. Risk management

1 to 9

EN

Is this number adequate

No

EN

c. Monitoring

None

EN

Is this number adequate

66. Is your country using training material and/or technical guidance for training in risk assessment and risk management of LMOs?

No

EN

67. If you answered Yes to question 66, is your country using the “Manual on Risk Assessment of LMOs” (developed by the CBD Secretariat) for training in risk assessment?

68. If you answered Yes to question 66, is your country using the “Guidance on Risk Assessment of LMOs” (developed by the Online Forum and the AHTEG on Risk Assessment and Risk Management) for training in risk assessment?

69. Does your country have specific needs for further guidance on specific topics of risk assessment of LMOs?

Yes

EN

viewNationalReportT.additionalInformation

The Republic of Suriname has specific needs for technical guidance on detection, identification, risk assessment and monitoring of LMOs

EN

70. Does your country have the capacity to detect, identify, assess the risk of and/or monitor living modified organisms or specific traits that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking into account risks to human health?

a. Detect

Yes

EN

b. Identify

Yes

EN

c. Assess the risk

No

EN

d. Monitor

No

EN

Conducting risk assessment or risk management

71. Has your country adopted or used any guidance documents for the purpose of conducting risk assessment or risk management, or for evaluating risk assessment reports submitted by notifiers?

a. Risk assessment

No

EN

b. Risk management

No

EN

72. If you answered Yes to question 71, is your country using the “Guidance on Risk Assessment of LMOs” (developed by the Online Forum and the AHTEG on Risk Assessment and Risk Management) for conducting risk assessment or risk management, or for evaluating risk assessment reports submitted by notifiers?

73. Has your country adopted common approaches or methodologies to risk assessment in coordination with other countries?

No

EN

74. Has your country cooperated with other Parties with a view to identifying LMOs or specific traits that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity?

No

EN

75. In the current reporting period, has your country conducted any kind of risk assessment of LMOs, including for contained use, field trials, commercial purposes, direct use as food, feed, or for processing?

No

EN

76. If you answered Yes to question 75, how many risk assessments were conducted?

77. If you answered Yes to question 75, please indicate the scope of the risk assessments (select all that apply)

78. If you answered Yes to question 75, were risk assessments conducted for all decisions taken on LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment or on domestic use of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing?

79. Has your country established appropriate mechanisms, measures and strategies to regulate and manage risks identified in the risk assessment of LMOs?

No

EN

80. Has your country taken appropriate measures to prevent unintentional transboundary movements of LMOs, including such measures as requiring a risk assessment to be carried out prior to the first release of a LMO?

No

EN

81. Has your country taken measures to ensure that any LMO, whether imported or locally developed, undergoes an appropriate period of observation that is commensurate with its life-cycle or generation time before it is put to its intended use?

No

EN

82. Has your country established a mechanism for monitoring potential effects of LMOs released into the environment?

No

EN

83. Does your country have the necessary infrastructure (e.g. laboratory facilities) for monitoring or managing LMOs?

No

EN

84. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Articles 15 and 16 in your country

Because the necessary regulations are not in place, these measures can not be implemented.

EN

Article 17 – Unintentional transboundary movements² and emergency measures

² In accordance with the operational definition adopted in decision CP-VIII/16, “‘Unintentional transboundary movement’ is a transboundary movement of a living modified organism that has inadvertently crossed the national borders of a Party where the living modified organism was released, and the requirements of Article 17 of the Protocol apply to such transboundary movements only if the living modified organism involved is likely to have significant adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, in the affected or potentially affected States.”

85. Has your country established measures to notify affected or potentially affected States, the Biosafety Clearing-House and, where appropriate, relevant international organizations in case of a release under its jurisdiction that leads, or may lead, to an unintentional transboundary movement?

No

EN

86. In the current reporting period, how many releases of LMOs occurred under your country’s jurisdiction that led, or may have led, to an unintentional transboundary movement?

None

EN

87. If you answered under question 86 that a release occurred, has your country notified affected or potentially affected States, the Biosafety Clearing-House and, where appropriate, relevant international organizations?

88. Does your country have the capacity to take appropriate response measures in response to unintentional transboundary movements?

No

EN

89. In the current reporting period, how many times has your country become aware of an unintentional transboundary movement into its territory?

None

EN

90. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 17 in your country

Because the necessary regulations are not in place, these measures can not be implemented.

EN

Article 18 – Handling, transport, packaging and identification

91. Has your country taken measures to require that LMOs that are subject to transboundary movement are handled, packaged and transported under conditions of safety, taking into account relevant international rules and standards?

No

EN

92. Has your country taken measures to require that documentation accompanying LMOs-FFP, in cases where the identity of the LMOs is not known, clearly identifies that they may contain LMOs and are not intended for intentional introduction into the environment, as well as a contact point for further information?

No

EN

93. Has your country taken measures to require that documentation accompanying LMOs-FFP, in cases where the identity of the LMOs is known, clearly identifies that they contain LMOs and are not intended for intentional introduction into the environment, as well as a contact point for further information?

No

EN

94. If you answered Yes to question(s) 91, 92 and/or 93, what type of documentation accompanying LMOs does your country require?

95. Has your country taken measures to require that documentation accompanying LMOs that are destined for contained use clearly identifies them as LMOs and specifies any requirements for the safe handling, storage, transport and use, the contact point for further information, including the name and address of the individual and institution to whom the LMO are consigned?

No

EN

96. If you answered Yes to question 95, what type of documentation does your country require for the identification of LMOs that are destined for contained use?

97. Has your country taken measures to require that documentation accompanying LMOs that are intended for intentional introduction into the environment of the Party of import clearly identifies them as living modified organisms; specifies the identity and relevant traits and/or characteristics, any requirements for the safe handling, storage, transport and use, the contact point for further information and, as appropriate, the name and address of the importer and exporter; and contains a declaration that the movement is in conformity with the requirements of this Protocol applicable to the exporter?

No

EN

98. If you answered Yes to question 97, what type of documentation does your country require for the identification of LMOs that are intended for intentional introduction into the environment?

99. Does your country have available any guidance for the purpose of ensuring the safe handling, transport, and packaging of living modified organisms?

No

EN

100. Does your country have the capacity to enforce the requirements of identification and documentation of LMOs?

No

EN

101. How many customs officers in your country have received training in the identification of LMOs?

None

EN

Is this number adequate

102. Has your country established procedures for the sampling and detection of LMOs?

No

EN

103. How many laboratory personnel in your country have received training in detection of LMOs?

None

EN

Is this number adequate

104. Does your country have reliable access to laboratory facilities for the detection of LMOs?

No

EN

105. How many laboratories in your country are certified for LMO detection?

None

EN

106. If you answered under question 105 that certified laboratories exist in your country, how many of them are currently operating in the detection of LMOs?

107. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 18 in your country

In the absence of a fully operational Biosafety Law there are no legal measures to ensure the implementation of this article. However, during the implementation of the Regional Biosafety Project (2012-2016) a potential national biosafety laboratory was identified, and some analytical equipment was received, but not sufficient for continuous LMO detection activities.

EN

Article 19 – Competent National Authorities and National Focal Points

108. In case your country has designated more than one competent national authority, has your country established a mechanism for the coordination of their actions prior to taking decisions regarding LMOs?

Not applicable (no competent national authority was designated)

EN

109. Has your country established adequate institutional capacity to enable the competent national authority(ies) to perform the administrative functions required by the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety?

No

EN

110. Has your country undertaken initiatives to strengthen collaboration among national focal points, competent national authority(ies) and other institutions on biosafety-related matters?

No

EN

111. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 19 in your country

There was no collaboration among NFPs and CNAs at the moment.

EN

Article 20 – Information Sharing and the Biosafety Clearing-House (BCH)

112. Please provide an overview of the status of the mandatory information provided by your country to the BCH by specifying for each category of information whether it is available and whether it has been submitted to the BCH.

a. Existing legislation, regulations and guidelines for implementing the Protocol, as well as information required by Parties for the advance informed agreement procedure (Article 20, paragraph 3 (a))

Information available but only partially available in the BCH

EN

b. Legislation, regulations and guidelines applicable to the import of LMOs intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (Article 11, paragraph 5)

Information not available

EN

c. Bilateral, multilateral and regional agreements and arrangements (Articles 14, paragraph 2 and 20, paragraph 3 (b))

Information not available

EN

d. Contact details for competent national authorities (Article 19, paragraphs 2 and 3), national focal points (Article 19, paragraphs 1 and 3), and emergency contacts (Article 17, paragraph 3 (e))

Information available but only partially available in the BCH

EN

e. Decisions by a Party regarding transit of LMOs (Article 6, paragraph 1)

Information not available

EN

f. Decisions by a Party regarding import of LMOs for contained use (Article 6, paragraph 2)

Information not available

EN

g. Notifications regarding the release under your country’s jurisdiction that leads, or may lead, to an unintentional transboundary movement of a LMO that is likely to have significant adverse effects on biological diversity (Article 17, paragraph 1)

Information not available

EN

h. Information concerning cases of illegal transboundary movements of LMOs (Article 25, paragraph 3)

Information not available

EN

i. Decisions regarding the importation of LMOs for intentional introduction into the environment (Article 10, paragraph 3)

Information not available

EN

j. Information on the application of domestic regulations to specific imports of LMOs (Article 14, paragraph 4)

Information not available

EN

k. Decisions regarding the domestic use of LMOs that may be subject to transboundary movement for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (Article 11, paragraph 1)

Information not available

EN

l. Decisions regarding the import of LMOs intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing that are taken under domestic regulatory frameworks (Article 11, paragraph 4) or in accordance with Annex III to the Protocol (Article 11, paragraph 6)

Information not available

EN

m. Declarations regarding the framework to be used for LMOs intended for direct use as food or feed, or for processing (Article 11, paragraph 6)

Information not available

EN

n. Review and change of decisions regarding intentional transboundary movements of LMOs (Article 12, paragraph 1)

Information not available

EN

o. Cases where intentional transboundary movement may take place at the same time as the movement is notified to the Party of import (Article 13, paragraph 1 (a))

Information not available

EN

p. LMOs granted exemption status by each Party (Article 13, paragraph 1 (b))

Information not available

EN

q. Summaries of risk assessments or environmental reviews of LMOs generated by regulatory processes and relevant information regarding products thereof (Article 20, paragraph 3 (c))

Information not available

EN

113. Please provide a brief explanation if you answered that the information is available but not in the BCH or only partially available in the BCH to any item under question 112:

Information on the Cartagena Protocol National Focal Point and the BCH focal point is available on the BCH. Also, the previous National Reports on the Cartagena Protocol and the National Biosafety Framework 2004 are available.

EN

114. Has your country established a mechanism for strengthening the capacity of the BCH National Focal Point to perform its administrative functions?

No

EN

115. Has your country established a mechanism for the coordination among the BCH National Focal Point, the Cartagena Protocol focal point, and the competent national authority(ies) for making information available to the BCH?

Yes

EN

116. Does your country use the information available in the BCH in its decision making processes on LMOs?

Not applicable (no decisions were taken)

EN

117. Has your country experienced difficulties accessing or using the BCH?

No

EN

118. In the current reporting period, how many biosafety-related events (e.g. seminars, workshops, press conferences, educational events) has your country organized?

1 to 4

EN

119. In the current reporting period, how many biosafety-related publications has your country published?

None

EN

120. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 20 in your country

The Republic of Suriname is participating in the UNEP-GEF Project for Sustainable Capacity Building for Effective Participation in the BCH (BCH III project). During the implementation of this project activities will be undertaken, which will be reported in the 5th cycle.

EN

Article 21 – Confidential information

121. Has your country established procedures to protect confidential information received under the Protocol?

No

EN

122. Does your country allow the notifier to identify information that is to be treated as confidential?

No

EN

123. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 21 in your country

There are no procedures available for managing LMO transport and therefore there are also no procedures for the notifier.

EN

Article 22 – Capacity-building

124. Does your country have predictable and reliable funding for building capacity for the effective implementation of the Protocol?

No

EN

125. Has your country received external support or benefited from collaborative activities with other Parties in the development and/or strengthening of human resources and institutional capacities in biosafety?

No

EN

126. If you answered Yes to question 125, how were these resources made available? (select all that apply)

127. Has your country provided support to other Parties in the development and/or strengthening of human resources and institutional capacities in biosafety?

No

EN

128. If you answered Yes to question 127, how were these resources made available? (select all that apply)

129. In the reporting period, has your country initiated a process to access funds from the Global Environment Facility (GEF) for building capacity in biosafety?

No

EN

130. If you answered Yes to question 129, how would you characterize the process?

131. In the current reporting period, has your country undertaken activities for the development and/or strengthening of human resources and institutional capacities in biosafety?

No

EN

132. If you answered Yes to question 131, in which of the following areas were these activities undertaken (select all that apply)?

133. In the current reporting period, has your country carried out a capacity-building needs assessment?

No

EN

134. Does your country still have capacity-building needs?

Yes

EN

135. If you answered Yes to question 134, which of the following areas still need capacity-building (select all that apply)?

Institutional capacity and human resources
Integration of biosafety in cross-sectoral and sectoral legislation, policies and institutions (mainstreaming biosafety)
Risk assessment and other scientific and technical expertise
Risk management
Public awareness, participation and education in biosafety
Information exchange and data management including participation in the Biosafety Clearing-House
Scientific, technical and institutional collaboration at subregional, regional and international levels
Technology transfer
Sampling, detection and identification of LMOs
Socio-economic considerations
Implementation of the documentation requirements for handling, transport, packaging and identification
Handling of confidential information
Measures to address unintentional and/or illegal transboundary movements of LMOs
Scientific biosafety research relating to LMOs
Taking into account risks to human health
Liability and redress

136. Has your country developed a capacity-building strategy or action plan?

No

EN

137. Does your country have in place a functional national mechanism for coordinating biosafety capacity-building initiatives?

No

EN

138. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 22 in your country, including further details about your experience in accessing GEF funds:

Activities linked to the Regional Biosafety Project, Caribbean and the BCH-III project strengthened institutional capacity and human resources on a basic scale were taken.

EN

Article 23 – Public awareness and participation

139. Is biosafety public awareness, education and/or participation addressed in legislation or policy in your country?

Yes, to some extent

EN

viewNationalReportT.additionalInformation

Paragraph 2.5 Public Awareness and Participation of NBF

EN

140. In the current reporting period, has your country cooperated with other States and international bodies in relation to public awareness, education and participation?

Yes

EN

viewNationalReportT.additionalInformation

Under the Regional Biosafety Project (2012-2016) a regional Biosafety hub, the Caribbean Centre for Biosafety, was established with support of the University of the West Indies

EN

141. Has your country established a mechanism to ensure public access to information on LMOs?

No

EN

142. Does your country have in place a national communication strategy on biosafety?

No

EN

143. Does your country have any awareness and outreach programmes on biosafety?

No

EN

144. Does your country currently have a national biosafety website?

Yes

EN

145. How many academic institutions in your country are offering biosafety education and training courses and programmes?

1 to 4

EN

Is this number adequate

Yes

EN

146. How many educational materials and/or online modules on biosafety are available and accessible to the public in your country?

None

EN

Is this number adequate

147. Has your country established a mechanism to consult the public in the decision-making process regarding LMOs?

Yes, to some extent

EN

viewNationalReportT.additionalInformation

Paragraph 2.5 Public Awareness and Participation of NBF, but is not implemented at this moment.

EN

148. Has your country informed the public about existing modalities for public participation in the decision-making process regarding LMOs?

No

EN

149. If you answered Yes to question 148, please indicate the modalities used to inform the public: (select all that apply)

150. In the current reporting period, how many times has your country consulted the public in the decision-making process regarding LMOs?

Not applicable (no decisions were taken)

EN

151. Has your country informed the public about the means to access the Biosafety Clearing-House?

Yes

EN

152. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 23 in your country

On 2 November 2016 a National Biosafety Seminar was held to inform the Public, Civil and Private Sector and Academia about the information received in the GEF-Regional Biosafety Project (2012-2016). The information provided was presented by the attendees of the workshops on (1) Border Control, (2) Food and Feed Safety Assessment of GMOs, (3) Detection methods for GMOs in the food chain, (4) Risk Communication and (5) Application of technical guidelines in decision-making. During a 2 day training from 3-4 November 2016, a BCH training was given to relevant stakeholders by a BCH Regional Advisor on the use of this mechanism.

EN

Article 24 – Non-Parties

153. Has your country entered into any bilateral, regional, or multilateral agreement with non-Parties regarding transboundary movements of LMOs?

No

EN

154. In the current reporting period, has your country imported LMOs from a non-Party?

No

EN

155. In the current reporting period, has your country exported LMOs to a non-Party?

No

EN

156. If you answered Yes to question 154 and/or 155, were the transboundary movements of LMOs consistent with the objective of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety?

157. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 24 in your country

Article 25 – Illegal transboundary movements³

³In accordance with the operational definition adopted in decision CP VIII/16, “‘Illegal transboundary movement’ is a transboundary movement of living modified organisms carried out in contravention of the domestic measures to implement the Protocol that have been adopted by the Party concerned”.

158. Has your country adopted domestic measures aimed at preventing and/or penalizing transboundary movements of LMOs carried out in contravention of its domestic measures to implement the Cartagena Protocol?

No

EN

159. In the current reporting period, how many cases of illegal transboundary movements of LMOs has your country become aware of?

None

EN

160. If you indicated under question 159 that your country became aware of cases of illegal transboundary movements, has the origin of the LMO(s) been established?

161. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 25 in your country

No data is available on this matter.

EN

Article 26 – Socio-economic considerations

162. Does your country have any specific approaches or requirements that facilitate how socioeconomic considerations should be taken into account in LMO decision-making?

No

EN

163. In the current reporting period, have socioeconomic considerations arising from the impact of LMOs been taken into account in decision-making?

Not applicable (no decisions were taken)

EN

164. How many peer-reviewed published materials has your country used for the purpose of elaborating or determining national actions with regard to socioeconomic considerations?

None

EN

Is this number adequate

165. Has your country cooperated with other Parties on research and information exchange on any socioeconomic impacts of LMOs?

No

EN

166. Here you may provide further details on the implementation of Article 26 in your country

Article 28 – Financial Mechanism and Resources

167. In the current reporting period, how much funding (in the equivalent of US dollars) has your country mobilized to support implementation of the Cartagena Protocol beyond the regular national budgetary allocation?

Nothing

EN

Article 33 – Monitoring and reporting

Article 33 requires Parties to monitor the implementation of its obligations under the Cartagena Protocol and to report to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on measures taken to implement the Protocol

168. Does your country have in place a system to monitor and enforce the implementation of the Cartagena Protocol?

No

EN

Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress

Parties to the Cartagena Protocol that are not yet Party to the Supplementary Protocol are also invited to respond to the questions below

169. Is your country a Party to the Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress?

No

EN

170. If you answered No to question 169, is there any national process in place towards becoming a Party to the Supplementary Protocol?

No

EN

171. Has your country introduced the necessary measures for the implementation of the Supplementary Protocol?

No measures have yet been taken

EN

172. Which instruments are in place for the implementation of the Supplementary Protocol?

173. Does your country have administrative or legal instruments that require response measures to be taken

a. In case of damage resulting from LMOs?

No

EN

b. In case there is sufficient likelihood that damage will result if response measures are not taken?

No

EN

174. If you answered Yes to question 173a, do these instruments impose requirements on an operator (select all that apply)?

175. If you answered Yes to question 173a, do these instruments require the operator to take response measures to avoid damage?

176. If you answered Yes to question 173a or 173b, do these instruments provide for a definition of “operator”?

177. If you answered Yes to question 176, which of the following could be an ‘operator’ (select all that apply)?

178. Has a competent authority been identified for carrying out the functions set out in the Supplementary Protocol?

No

EN

179. If you answered Yes to question 178, what measures may the competent authority take (select all that apply)?

180. Does your country have measures in place to provide for financial security for damage resulting from LMOs?

No

EN

181. If you answered Yes to question 180, what type of financial security measures are in place (select all that apply)?

182. Does your country have rules and procedures on civil liability that address damage resulting from LMOs, or has such damage been recognized in court rulings (select all that apply)?

No

183. Have there been any occurrences of damage resulting from LMOs in your country?

No

EN

184. If you answered Yes to question 183, have response measures been taken?

185. Here you may provide further details on any activities undertaken in your country towards the implementation of the Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress

The Republic of Suriname hasn’t adopted this Supplementary Protocol as yet. Before this is done, the other obstacles mentioned in the previous sections regarding the implementation of the Cartagena protocol need to be addressed first.

EN

Other information

186. Please use this field to provide any other information on issues related to national implementation of the Protocol, including any obstacles or impediments encountered.

Comments on reporting format

187. Please use this field to provide any other information on difficulties that you have encountered in filling in this report.

With Question 12, an extra box for “not applicable” would be recommended. Question 65c, an option for the the follow-up question 'is this number adequate?' is not available in the online version. Question 101, 103 and 146 if the answer is “none”, the question further on “is this number adequate” is not applicable. Also for question 146, it is hard to give an answer to this question; modules for a course would not be publicly available. It would be better to ask if academic institutions let their modules be accessible to the public.

EN

You are viewing a DELETED record.

This document has been updated. This is not the latest published version. Click here to view the latest version of the record.

Comparing version with latest version 2

Quick links

Need help?

THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

Quick Links

Topics

Information

A part of

You are viewing a DELETED record.

This document has been updated. This is not the latest published version. Click here to view the latest version of the record.

Comparing version with latest version 2 Close comparison

Quick links

Need help?

THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

Quick Links

Topics

Information

A part of

Comparing version with latest version 2