Loading...
This record has been deleted. Since it is linked to a published record, it is available here for reference purposes only.
Click here to view the deleted recordThis document has been updated. This is not the latest published version. Click here to view the latest version of the record.
Biosafety Virtual Library Resources
(VLR)
published: 02 Sep 2007
last updated: 02 May 2012
Debating the Precautionary Principle: “Guilty until Proven Innocent” or “Innocent until Proven Guilty”?
EN
Person:Mr. Henk van den BeltPhone:Fax: +31 317 485 453,Email:Website:Related OrganizationE-mail henk.vandenbelt@wur.nl ()Phone:Fax: +31 317 485 453,Email:Website:
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLANT BIOLOGISTS
United States of America
EN
2003-07
EN
Plant Physiology; pp. 1122–1126; Volume: 132.
EN
2003 the American Society of Plant Biologists
EN
This paper debates issues associated to the Precautionary Principle.
A review Article with the following headings:
1. The Precautionary Principle.
2. The Logic of Pascals Wager
3. Burdens and Standards of Proof
4. The Future of World Agriculture
EN
A review Article with the following headings:
1. The Precautionary Principle.
2. The Logic of Pascals Wager
3. Burdens and Standards of Proof
4. The Future of World Agriculture
- GBF-T17. Strengthen biosafety and distribute benefits of biotechnology
No
No
No
Identifier (ISBN, ISSN, etc.)
ISSN: 1532-2548
Format
Paper, Adobe Acrobat Reader (5 pages)
PDF
Keywords and any other relevant information
precautionary principle
gmos/lmos
Citation: Plant Physiology July 2003 vol. 132 no. 3 1122-1126
