Loading...
This record has been deleted. Since it is linked to a published record, it is available here for reference purposes only.
Click here to view the deleted recordThis document has been updated. This is not the latest published version. Click here to view the latest version of the record.
Biosafety Virtual Library Resources
(VLR)
published: 25 Apr 2008
last updated: 08 May 2012
Weeds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. I. Effects on abundance and diversity
EN
Person:Dr. Matt Heard, Centre for Ecology & HydrologyMonks Wood Abbots RiptonHuntingdon, Cambridgeshire
PE282LS, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern IrelandPhone: +1487 772400,Fax: +1487 773467,Email: mshe@ceh.ac.uk,Website: http://www.ceh.ac.uk/index.html,Related OrganizationNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)Monks Wood Abbots RiptonHuntingdon, Cambridgeshire
PE282LS, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern IrelandPhone: +1487 772400,Fax: +1487 773467,Email: mshe@ceh.ac.uk,Website: http://www.ceh.ac.uk/index.html,
The Royal Society, London
EN
2003-10
EN
Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B (Biological Sciences)
EN
© 2003 The Royal Society
EN
We compared the seedbanks, seed rains, plant densities and biomasses of weeds under two contrasting systems of management in beet, maize and spring oilseed rape. Weed seedbank and plant density were measured at the same locations in two subsequent seasons. About 60 fields were sown with each crop. Each field was split, one half being sown with a conventional variety managed according to the farmer’s normal practice, the other half being sown with a genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) variety, with weeds controlled by a broad-spectrum herbicide. In beet and rape, plant densities shortly after sowing were higher in the GMHT treatment. Following weed control in conventional beet, plant densities were approximately one-fifth of those in GMHT beet. In both beet and rape, this effect was reversed after the first application of broad-spectrum herbicide, so that late-season plant densities were lower in the GMHT treatments. Biomass and seed rain in GMHT crops were between one-third and one-sixth of those in conventional treatments. The effects of differing weed-seed returns in these two crops persisted in the seedbank: densities following the GMHT treatment were about 20% lower than those following the conventional treatment. The effect of growing maize was quite different. Weed density was higher throughout
the season in the GMHT treatment. Late-season biomass was 82% higher and seed rain was 87% higher than in the conventional treatment. The difference was not subsequently detectable in the seedbank because the total seed return was low after both treatments. In all three crops, weed diversity was little affected by the treatment, except for transient effects immediately following herbicide application.
EN
the season in the GMHT treatment. Late-season biomass was 82% higher and seed rain was 87% higher than in the conventional treatment. The difference was not subsequently detectable in the seedbank because the total seed return was low after both treatments. In all three crops, weed diversity was little affected by the treatment, except for transient effects immediately following herbicide application.
- GBF-T17. Strengthen biosafety and distribute benefits of biotechnology
No
No
No
Identifier (ISBN, ISSN, etc.)
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2003.1402
Format
14 page journal article
PDF
Keywords and any other relevant information
arable weeds; Britain; genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops; Farm Scale Evaluations
Citation:
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B (2003) 358, 1819–1832
LMO categories: Plants