Loading...
Biosafety Virtual Library Resources (VLR)
  |  
published: 04 May 2012 last updated: 08 May 2012

General information
Effects of Plants Genetically Modified for Insect Resistance on Nontarget Organisms
EN
Maureen O'Callaghan, Travis R. Glare, Elisabeth P.J. Burgess, and Louise A. Malone Maureen O'Callaghan & Travis R. Glare AgResearch, PO Box 60, Lincoln Canterbury, New Zealand email: maureen.ocallaghan@agresearch.co.nz ; travis.glare@agresearch.co.nz Elisabeth P.J. Burgess & Louise A. Malone HortResearch, Private Bag 92169 Auckland, New Zealand email: eburgess@hortresearch.co.nz ; lmalone@hortresearch.co.nz
EN
Annual Reviews
EN
2005
EN
Annual Review of Entomology
EN
Copyright © 2005 by Annual Reviews
EN
Access to the resource(s)
Information on the content of the resource
Abstract:

Insect resistance, based on Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) endotoxins, is the second most widely used trait (after herbicide resistance) in commercial genetically modified (GM) crops. Other modifications for insect resistance, such as proteinase inhibitors and lectins, are also being used in many experimental crops. The extensive testing on nontarget plant-feeding insects and beneficial species that has accompanied the long-term and wide-scale use of Bt plants has not detected significant adverse effects. GMplants expressing other insect-resistant proteins that have a broader spectrum of activity have been tested on only a limited number of nontarget species. Little is known about the persistence of transgene-derived proteins in soil, with the exception of Bt endotoxins, which can persist in soil for several months. Bt plants appear to have little impact on soil biota such as earthworms, collembolans, and general soil microflora. Further research is required on the effects of GM plants on soil processes such as decomposition. Assessment of nontarget impacts is an essential part of the risk assessment process for insect-resistant GM plants.
EN
Keywords for facilitating searching for information in the clearing-houses
  • GBF-T17. Strengthen biosafety and distribute benefits of biotechnology

https://bch.cbd.int/onlineconferences/ra_guidance_references.shtml

Yes
No
No
No
Additional Information
Identifier (ISBN, ISSN, etc.)
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130352
Format
24 page PDF
Keywords and any other relevant information
Key Words Bacillus thuringiensis, environmental impact, risk assessment, natural enemies, pollinators, soil biota Citation: Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2005. 50:271–92
EN