Loading...
Risk Assessment generated by a regulatory process (RA)
  |  
BCH-RA-NL-103937-2   |   PDF   |   Print   |  
last updated: 25 Sep 2012
General Information
Field trial with scab resistant cisgenic apples
EN
31 May 2011
Risk assessment details
  • Cisgenic apple trees with scab resistance
    | Plant Research International(PRI) | Resistance to diseases and pests (Fungi)
Methodology and points to consider
THe GM apple trees contain a cisgenic copy of the scab resistance gene HcrVf2. This gene encodes a protein with an extracellular receptor (LLR-TM type)originating form Malus floribunda. This type of proteins is invloved in the pathogen recognition followed by a signal-induced defence mechanism. These proteins are common in apple and other consumed crops and vegatables and have no known adverse effects on animals.
EN
The flowers will only be hand-pollinated. The likelihood of insect-pollination will be eliminated because no (commercial) bee colonies will be used for pollination. Furthermore there will be no cultivation of apple trees in de vicinity of the field trial. There are no othe orchards present within a distance of over 500 m.

Dispersal of seeds will be prevented by collection and subsequent destruction of apples grown on the trial plot.
EN
No specific environmental impact is expected. The trait and the gene that is introduced are already present within the apple germplasm. Benchmarks are provided by the resistant cultivars carrying the same gene originating from conventional breeding programs. Such non-GM apple cultivars with this particular gene are being cultivated and commercialized for approximately 12 years now without any known positive or negative effects on the environment other than that less chemoprotectants have to be used in cultivation. Therefore, no direct or indirect selective advantages in natural environments are to be expected for the GMPts carrying this gene; cultivation of elite, high quality apple cultivars equipped with this gene by GM will contribute to the desired reduction in the use of chemicals. This can be regarded as a benefit for growers and consumers.
EN
The risk on any adverse effect is considered to be negligible.
EN
Control of risks is achieved by the small scale of the trial, by the use of a gene derived from apple itself. Apples will not enter the food chain and will be collected, scored for symptom development and destroyed. An isolation distance of 150 metres will be implemented within which no growth or cultivation of other apples will take place. No pollinators will be used, only hand pollination. Monitoring will take place with a minimum of four times per month during the growing season.
EN
EN
The Central-Netherlands. In this same region commercial production of apple occurs also.
EN
No specific validated detection method available.
EN
Additional information
No specific environmental impact is expected. The trait and the gene that is introduced are already present within the apple germplasm. Benchmarks are provided by the resistant cultivars carrying the same gene originating from conventional breeding programs. Such non-GM apple cultivars with this particular gene are being cultivated and commercialized for approximately 12 years now without any known positive or negative effects on the environment other than that less chemoprotectants have to be used in cultivation. Therefore, no direct or indirect selective advantages in natural environments are to be expected for the GMPts carrying this gene; cultivation of elite, high quality apple cultivars equipped with this gene by GM will contribute to the desired reduction in the use of chemicals. This can be regarded as a benefit for growers and consumers.

Control of risks is achieved by the small scale of the trial, by the use of a gene derived from apple itself. Apples will not enter the food chain and will be collected, scored for symptom development and destroyed. An isolation distance of 150 metres will be implemented within which no growth or cultivation of other apples will take place. No pollinators will be used, only hand pollination. Monitoring will take place with a minimum of four times per month during the growing season.

A secondary goal of this field trial is to gain data on environmental and other aspects required by the Dutch government to be able to prepare for so-called Category 2 field trials with these cisgenic and/or intragenic apple lines.
EN