Loading...
This record has been deleted. Since it is linked to a published record, it is available here for reference purposes only.
Click here to view the deleted recordThis document has been updated. This is not the latest published version. Click here to view the latest version of the record.
Biosafety Virtual Library Resources
(VLR)
last updated: 29 Jul 2013
Socio-economic Impacts of Living Modified Organisms in Agriculture: Towards an Assessment Guideline
EN
Regional Agricultural and Environmental Innovations Network - Africa
(RAEIN-Africa)
BCH-ORG-SCBD-30375-4
- Non-governmental organization (NGO)
19 Frikkie de Beer Street
Atterbury Estate
Menlyn
Pretoria,
Gauteng0063, South Africa
Phone: +27 12 348-0892, +27 60 518-6261, +27 60 518 6262,
Fax:
Website: www.raein-africa.org,
RAEIN-Africa Secretariat, Windhoek, Namibia
EN
2012
EN
Copyright © 2012, RAEIN-Africa Secretariat
EN
The Table of Contents is as follows:
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose and Scope
1.2 Guideline Development Process
2 BACKGROUND
2.1 Southern African Context
2.2 Provisions for Socio-economic Impact Assessment in the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
2.3 Provisions for SEC in National Biosafety Frame works in Southern Africa
3 Review of other initiatives on Socio-economic considerations related to GMOs
3.1 Initiatives in the EU and in EU Member countries
3.1.1 Government of the Netherlands
3.1.2 JRC-FAO Workshop on SECs
4 Options for Inclusion of SEIA in Biosafety Decision Making
4.1 Which applications should require a SEIA?
4.2 Who should conduct the SEIA?
5 SEIA PROCESS
5.1 Principles of Socio-economic Impact Assessment
5.2 Phases of the Assessment
5.2.1 Profiling of Baseline Conditions
5.2.2 In-depth household surveys
5.2.3 Impact Assessment
6 APPLYING THE SEIA IN DECISION-MAKING
7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E) FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT
7.1 Defining SEIA quality
7.2 M&E and quality management framework
7.3 Implementing an inventory quality management system
7.3.1 Establish a SEIA quality assurance team
7.3.2 Develop a quality management plan
7.3.3 Perform generic quality checks
7.3.4 Perform targeted area quality checks
7.3.5 Review final SEIA issues and reports
7.3.6 Institutionalise formal feedback loops
7.3.7 Establish reporting, documentation, and archiving procedures
8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
9 REFERENCE
EN
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose and Scope
1.2 Guideline Development Process
2 BACKGROUND
2.1 Southern African Context
2.2 Provisions for Socio-economic Impact Assessment in the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
2.3 Provisions for SEC in National Biosafety Frame works in Southern Africa
3 Review of other initiatives on Socio-economic considerations related to GMOs
3.1 Initiatives in the EU and in EU Member countries
3.1.1 Government of the Netherlands
3.1.2 JRC-FAO Workshop on SECs
4 Options for Inclusion of SEIA in Biosafety Decision Making
4.1 Which applications should require a SEIA?
4.2 Who should conduct the SEIA?
5 SEIA PROCESS
5.1 Principles of Socio-economic Impact Assessment
5.2 Phases of the Assessment
5.2.1 Profiling of Baseline Conditions
5.2.2 In-depth household surveys
5.2.3 Impact Assessment
6 APPLYING THE SEIA IN DECISION-MAKING
7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E) FOR QUALITY MANAGEMENT
7.1 Defining SEIA quality
7.2 M&E and quality management framework
7.3 Implementing an inventory quality management system
7.3.1 Establish a SEIA quality assurance team
7.3.2 Develop a quality management plan
7.3.3 Perform generic quality checks
7.3.4 Perform targeted area quality checks
7.3.5 Review final SEIA issues and reports
7.3.6 Institutionalise formal feedback loops
7.3.7 Establish reporting, documentation, and archiving procedures
8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
9 REFERENCE
- GBF-T17. Strengthen biosafety and distribute benefits of biotechnology
No
No
No
Identifier (ISBN, ISSN, etc.)
Format
73 page PDF file