Our website will be undergoing scheduled maintenance from May 9, 23:00 UTC to May 11, 23:00 UTC. During this time, the site may be temporarily unavailable.
|
|
english
|
español
|
français
|
Sign Up for an Account
|
Sign In
Country Profiles...
The Convention
Cartagena Protocol
Supplementary Protocol
BCH
Secretariat
The Cartagena Protocol
What's new
About the Protocol
Text of the Cartagena Protocol
Implementation Plan for the Protocol
Global Biodiversity Framework
Liaison Group on the Cartagena Protocol
Nagoya – Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress
Key Protocol Issues
Assessment and Review
Capacity Building
Compliance
Financial Mechanism
Mainstreaming
Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
What has been done
Article 18, paragraph 2
Article 18, paragraph 3
Decisions
Sampling, Detection and Identification
Relevant documents
Customs Portal
Information sharing
Monitoring and Reporting
Public Awareness and Participation
Risk Assessment
Risk Management
Roster of Experts
Socio-economic Considerations
Transit and Contained Use
Unintentional Transboundary Movements
Parties
List of Parties
Becoming a Party
National Contacts
National Reports
Status of Contributions
COP-MOP (Governing Body)
COP-MOP Bureau
COP-MOP Meetings
COP-MOP Decisions
Activities and Documentation
Meetings and Documents
Notifications
Reports of the Executive Secretary
Resources
The Biosafety Clearing-House
Frequently Asked Questions
Media and Outreach
A video on the Cartagena Protocol
Search the VLR
Publications
Protocols and decisions
Fact Sheets and Banners
Newsletter
Biosafety Technical Series
Other Publications
Home
|
The Cartagena Protocol
|
HTPI
|
What has been done
What has been done on Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification
Identification requirements in documentation accompanying LMOs
What has been done since the
first meeting
of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Protocol
(COP-MOP)
The need for and modalities of developing standards
What has been done since the
first meeting
of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Protocol
(COP-MOP)
The ICCP process
Prior to the entry into force of the Protocol, an interim governing body, the Intergovernmental Committee for the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (ICCP), was established by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (
decision EM-I/3
).
At its first meeting, the ICCP reviewed relevant international rules and standards pertaining to handling, transport, packaging and identification and considered modalities for developing standards (
UNEP/CBD/ICCP/1/6
). ICCP-1 also invited Parties to the Convention, other Governments and relevant international organizations to provide to the Secretariat information on their existing practices, rules and standards relevant to Article 18 of the Protocol.
At its second meeting, the ICCP considered the synthesis of information provided by Parties, Governments and relevant international organizations on their existing practices, rules and standards relevant to Article 18 of the Protocol. It reviewed latest developments in existing rules, practices and standards and suggested options for coordinating the work with the work of other relevant international bodies (
UNEP/CBD/ICCP/2/12/CORR1
). ICCP-2, in its
recommendation 2/10
, requested Parties, other Governments and relevant international organizations to provide any views and relevant information to the Secretariat regarding requirements contained in the first sentence of Article 18, paragraph 2 (a), by the time of entry into force of the Protocol and of each element of paragraph 2 (a) of Article 18 of the Protocol.
At its third meeting, in its
recommendation 3/6
, the ICCP forwarded a number of recommendations to the first meeting of the COP-MOP from information provided by an expert meeting on Handling, Transport, Packaging and Identification of LMOs. It invited views on the development of a unique identification system for LMOs. ICCP-3 reviewed a synthesis of views and relevant information on the requirements of paragraph 2 (a) of Article 18. It also considered modalities of information requirements for accompanying documentation under paragraphs 2 (b) and 2 (c) of Article 18.
Go to the top of the page
Contact us
|
Site Map
|
Linkages Policy
|
Privacy Policy
|
Disclaimer
|
© SCBD 2001-2016
Update on 2019-02-08
Rate this page