BS-IV/12. Liability and redress
under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the
Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,
Recalling Article 27 of the Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety, which requires the Conference of the Parties serving as
the meeting of Parties to adopt, at its first meeting, a process
with respect to the appropriate elaboration of international rules
and procedures in the field of liability and redress for damage
resulting from transboundary movements of living modified
organisms, analysing and taking due account of the on-going
processes in international law on these matters, and to endeavour
to complete this process within four years,
Recalling its decision BS-I/8, in which it decided to
establish an Open-ended Ad Hoc Working Group of Legal and Technical
Experts on Liability and Redress in the Context of the Cartagena
Protocol on Biosafety, with the terms of reference set out in the
annex to that decision, to carry out the process pursuant to
Article 27 of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,
Noting with appreciation the work undertaken by the
Open-ended Ad Hoc Working Group of Legal and Technical Experts on
Liability and Redress in the Context of the Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety,
Expressing its appreciation to the Government of
Colombia for hosting in Cartagena from 12-19 March 2008 the fifth
meeting of the Open-ended Ad Hoc Working Group of Legal and
Technical Experts on Liability and Redress in the Context of the
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,
Taking note of the final report of the Open-ended Ad
Hoc Working Group of Legal and Technical Experts on Liability and
Redress in the Context of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
(UNEP/CBD/BS/COP-MOP/4/11 and Add.1),
Also taking note of the work undertaken by the Contact
Group on Liability and Redress at the fourth meeting of the
Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to
the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,
1. Decides to establish a Group of the Friends of the
Co-Chairs, Ms. Jimena Nieto (Colombia) and Mr. René Lefeber (the
Netherlands), Concerning Liability and Redress in the Context of
the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, with the following terms of
reference:
(a) The Group shall hold one meeting and, if deemed necessary by
the Co-Chairs, another meeting prior to the fifth meeting of the
Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to
the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety;
(b) The Group will further negotiate international rules and
procedures in the field of liability and redress for damage
resulting from transboundary movements of living modified organisms
in the context of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety on the basis
of the annex to this decision;
(c) The first meeting will be held in early 2009, for a period
of five days, and the second meeting, if deemed necessary by the
Co-Chairs, in early 2010, also for a period of five days, subject
to the availability of funds;
(d) The meetings will be held in Montreal, unless an offer is
made to host a meeting;
(e) The composition of the Group will be as follows: six
representatives of the Asia-Pacific region, namely Bangladesh,
China, India, Malaysia, Palau, and the Philippines; two
representatives of the European Union; two representatives of
Central and Eastern Europe; six representatives of the African
Group; six representatives of the Latin American and Caribbean
Group; and New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland and Japan;
(f) The Friends of the Co-Chairs may be accompanied by advisors
from Parties as selected by the Friends. The participation of such
advisors from eligible Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety may be facilitated subject to the availability of
funds;
(g) Observers may be invited to participate in the meetings or
parts thereof at the discretion of the Co-Chairs;
(h) The outcome will be presented by the Co-Chairs to the fifth
meeting of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of
the Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety for its
consideration; and
2. Calls upon Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and
other Governments to consider providing voluntary contributions to
organize these meetings and to facilitate participation by
representatives (Friends and advisors) of eligible Parties to the
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.
Annex
PROPOSED OPERATIONAL TEXTS ON
APPROACHES AND OPTIONS IDENTIFIED PERTAINING TO LIABILITY
AND REDRESS IN THE CONTEXT OF ARTICLE 27 OF THE BIOSAFETY
PROTOCOL
1. Working Towards
Legally Binding Provisions |
1.A. ADMINISTRATIVE
APPROACH |
I. STATE RESPONSIBILITY
(FOR INTERNATIONALLY WRONGFUL ACTS, INCLUDING BREACH OF OBLIGATIONS
OF THE PROTOCOL) |
Operational text
These rules and procedures shall not affect the rights and
obligations of States under the rules of general international law
with respect to the responsibility of States for internationally
wrongful acts.
Preambular text
Recognizing that these rules and procedures would not affect the
rights and obligations of States under the rules of general
international law with respect to the responsibility of States for
internationally wrongful acts.
II. SCOPE |
A. Functional
scope |
Operational text 1
1. These rules and procedures apply to transport, transit,
handling and use of living modified organisms [and products
thereof], provided that these activities find their origin in a
transboundary movement. The living modified organisms referred to
are those:
(a) Intended for direct use as food or feed, or for
processing;
(b) Destined for contained use;
(c) Intended for intentional introduction into the
environment.
2. With respect to intentional transboundary movements, these
rules and procedures apply to damage resulting from any authorized
use of the living modified organisms [and products thereof]
referred to in paragraph 1.
3. These rules and procedures also apply to unintentional
transboundary movements as referred to in Article 17 of the
Protocol as well as illegal transboundary movements as referred to
in Article 25 of the Protocol.
Operational text 2
These rules and procedures apply to areas within the limits of
its national jurisdiction[, including the exclusive economic zone,]
[or control] of the Parties to the Protocol.
Operational text 3
These rules and procedures apply to damage resulting from a
transboundary movement of living modified organisms when that
transboundary movement was commenced after their implementation by
Parties into domestic law.
Operational text 3 alt
These rules and procedures apply to damage resulting from a
transboundary movement of living modified organisms that started
after the entry into force of these rules and procedures.
D. Limitation to the
authorization at the time of the import of the living modified
organisms |
Operational text 4
[These rules and procedures apply to intentional transboundary
movement in relation to the use for which living modified organisms
are destined and for which authorization has been granted prior to
the transboundary movement. If, after the living modified organisms
are already in the country of import, a new authorization is given
for a different use of the same living modified organisms, such use
will not be covered by these rules and procedures.]
Operational text 5
1. National rules on liability and redress implementing these
rules and procedures should also cover damage resulting from the
transboundary movements of living modified organisms from
non-Parties, in accordance with Article 24 of the Protocol.
2. These rules and procedures apply to "transboundary movements"
of living modified organisms, as defined in Article 3(k) of the
Protocol.
III.
DAMAGE |
A. Definition of
damage |
Operational text 6
1. These rules and procedures apply to damage to the
conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking
also into account [damage] [risks] to human health[, resulting from
transboundary movement of living modified organisms].
2. For the purpose of these rules and procedures, damage to the
conservation [and sustainable use] of biological diversity as
defined in Article 2 of the Convention on Biological Diversity,
means an adverse or negative effect on biological diversity
that:
(a) Is measurable or otherwise observable taking into account,
wherever available, scientifically-established baselines recognized
by a competent national authority that takes into account any other
human induced variation and natural variation; and
(b) Is significant as set out in paragraph 4 below.
3. [For the purposes of these rules and procedures, damage to
the sustainable use, as defined in Article 2 of the Convention on
Biological Diversity of biological diversity, means an adverse or
negative effect on biological diversity that is significant as set
out in paragraph 4 below and [may have resulted in loss of income]
[has resulted in consequential loss to a state, including loss of
income].].
4. A "significant" adverse or negative effect on the
conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity as defined
in Article 2 of the Convention on Biological Diversity is to be
determined on the basis of factors, such as:
(a) The long term or permanent change, to be understood as
change that will not be redressed through natural recovery within a
reasonable period of time;
[(b) The extent of the qualitative or quantitative changes that
adversely or negatively affect the components of biological
diversity;
(c) The reduction of the ability of components of biological
diversity to provide goods and services;]
[(b and c alt) A qualitative or quantitative reduction of
components of biodiversity and their potential to provide goods and
services;]
[(d) The extent of any adverse or negative effects on human
health;]
[(d alt) The extent of any adverse or negative effects of the
conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity on human
health; ]
[5. Parties may take into account local and regional conditions
in order to ensure the workability of domestic liability rules and
procedures, provided that this is consistent with the objective and
provisions of the Protocol.]
Operational text 7
[1. Damage to conservation and sustainable use of biological
diversity shall be valued on the basis of the costs of response
measures [in accordance with domestic laws and provisions].
2. For the purposes of these rules and procedures, response
measures are reasonable actions to:
(i) [prevent,] minimize or contain damage, as appropriate;
[(ii) restore to the condition that existed before the damage or
the nearest equivalent, by the replacement of the loss by other
components of the biological diversity at the same location or for
the same use or at another location or for another type of
use.]]
Operational text 8
A causal link needs to be established between the damage and the
activity in question in accordance with domestic law.
IV. PRIMARY
COMPENSATION SCHEME |
A. Elements of
administrative approach based on allocation of costs of response
measures and restoration measures |
Operational text 9
Parties [may][shall][, as appropriate,] [, consistent with
international [law] obligations,] provide for or take response
measures in accordance with domestic law or[, in the absence
thereof,] the procedures specified below, [provided that the
domestic law is consistent with the objective of these rules and
procedures].
Operational text 10
In the event of damage or imminent threat of damage, an operator
[shall][should] immediately inform the competent authority of the
damage or imminent threat of damage.
Operational text 10 alt
The Parties should endeavor to require the operator to inform
the competent authority of an accident which causes or threatens to
cause significant adverse damage to the conservation and
sustainable use of biological diversity.
Operational text 11
In the event of damage [or imminent threat of damage], an
operator shall, subject to the requirements of the competent
authority, investigate, assess and evaluate the damage [or imminent
threat of damage] and take appropriate response measures.
[In cases where no response measures can be implemented, the
operator shall provide monetary compensation for the damage caused
[where applicable under the domestic law].]
Operational text 11 alt
The Parties should endeavor to require any legal or natural
person who caused significant damage by that person's intentional
or negligent act or omission regarding the transboundary movement
to undertake reasonable response measures to avoid, minimize or
contain the impact of the damage.
Operational text 12
[1. The competent authority:
a) [should][shall] identify, in accordance with domestic law,
the operator which has caused the damage [or the imminent threat of
damage];
b) [should][shall] assess the significance of the damage and
determine which response measures should be taken by the
operator.]
2. The competent authority has the discretion to implement
appropriate measures[, in accordance with domestic law, if any,
including in particular] where the operator has failed to do
so.
3. The competent authority has the right to recover the costs
and expenses of, and incidental to, the implementation of any such
appropriate measures, from the operator.
Operational text 13
"Operator" means any person in [operational control][[direct or
indirect] command or control]:
(a) of the activity at the time of the incident [causing damage
resulting from the transboundary movement of living modified
organisms];
[(b) of the living modified organism [at the time that the
condition that gave rise to the damage] [or imminent threat of
damage] arose [including, where appropriate, the permit holder or
the person who placed the living modified organism on the market];]
[and/]or
(c) as provided by domestic law.
Operational text 13 alt
"Operator" means the developer, producer, notifier, exporter,
importer, carrier, or supplier.
Operational text 13 alt bis
"Operator" means any person in operational control of the
activity at the time of the incident and causing damage resulting
from the transboundary movement of living modified organisms.
Operational text 14
Decisions of the competent authority imposing or intending to
impose response measures should be reasoned and notified to the
operator who should be informed of the procedures and legal
remedies available to him, including the opportunity for the review
of such decisions, inter alia, through access to an independent
body, such as courts.
A bis. Additional
elements of an administrative approach |
1. Exemptions or
mitigation |
Operational text 15
[Domestic law may provide for] exemptions or mitigations [that]
may be invoked by the operator [in the case of recovery of the
costs and expenses]. Exemptions or mitigations [may be][are] based
on [any one or more elements of] the following [exhaustive]
list:
(a) Act of God or force majeure;
(b) Act of war or civil unrest;
[(c) Intervention by a third party [that caused damage despite
the fact that appropriate safety measures were in place];]
[(d) Compliance with compulsory measures imposed by a public
authority;]
[(d alt) A specific order imposed by a public authority on the
operator and the implementation of such order caused the
damage;]
[(e) An activity expressly authorized by and fully in conformity
with an authorization given under domestic law;]
[(f) An activity not considered likely to cause environmental
damage according to the state of scientific and technical knowledge
at the time when the activity was carried out;]
[(g) National security exceptions [or international
security]].
2. Recourse against
third party by the person who is liable on the basis of strict
liability |
Operational text 16
These rules and procedures do not limit or restrict any right of
recourse or indemnity that an operator may have against any other
person.
3. Limitation of
liability |
a. Limitation in time (relative time limit and absolute
time limit)
Operational text 17
Domestic law may provide for relative and/or absolute time
limits for the recovery of costs and expenses[, provided that such
limits shall not be less than [three] years for relative time limit
and [twenty] years for absolute time limit].
b. Limitation in amount
Operational text 18
Domestic law may provide for financial limits for the recovery
of costs and expenses[, provided that such limits shall not be less
than [z] special drawing rights].
Operational text 19
1. [Parties may[, consistent with international
[law][obligations],] require the operator to establish and
maintain, during the period of the time limit of liability,
financial security, including through self-insurance.]
2. [Parties are urged to take measures to encourage the
development of financial security instruments and markets by the
appropriate economic and financial operators, including financial
mechanisms in case of insolvency, with the aim of enabling
operators to use financial guarantees to cover their
responsibilities under domestic measures implementing these rules
and procedures.]
Operational text 1
[Parties may or may not develop a civil liability system or may
apply their existing one in accordance with their needs to deal
with living modified organisms.]
Operational text 2
(a) [Subject to subsections (b), (c) and (d) below, nothing in
these rules and procedures shall prejudice the right of Parties to
have in place or to develop their domestic law or policy in the
field of civil liability and redress resulting from the
transboundary movement of LMOs consistent with the objective of the
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and these rules and procedures/this
instrument/this supplementary Protocol.] [Parties may or may not
develop a civil liability system or may apply their existing one in
accordance with their needs to deal with living modified
organisms.] [Parties should ensure that their national civil
liability rules and procedures provide for redress to damage
resulting from the transboundary movement of living modified
organisms. In creating their national rules and procedures on civil
liability, Parties may give special consideration to sub-sections
(b), (c) and (d).]
(b) Any such law or policy, [shall] [include][address], inter
alia, the following elements, taking into account[, as
appropriate,] the Guidelines in Annex [x] [to this supplementary
Protocol][decision BS-V/x]:
a. Damage;
b. Standard of liability: that may include strict, fault or
mitigated liability;
c. Channelling of [strict] liability;
d. [Financial security, where feasible][compensation
schemes];
e. [Access to justice][Right to bring claims];
f. [[Procedural rules that provide for] due process.]
[(c) Parties shall recognize and enforce foreign judgments in
accordance with [the applicable rules of procedures of the domestic
courts] [domestic law] [governing the enforcement of foreign
judgments] in respect of matters within the scope of these rules
and procedures/this instrument/ the Guidelines in Annex [x] to this
[supplementary Protocol].[Parties who do not have legislation
concerning recognition of foreign judgments should endeavour to
enact such laws.]]
[(d) While this provision does not require any change in
domestic law, and does not in itself constitute a treaty on
reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments, Parties[, whose
domestic law requires bilateral reciprocity agreements for
recognition of foreign judgments] [shall endeavor to extend their
domestic law governing the reciprocal enforcement of foreign
judgments to other Parties not presently covered by their domestic
law].]
(c) & (d) alt
[Parties may, in accordance with domestic law, recognise and
enforce foreign judgments arising from the implementation of the
above guidelines.]
(e) The Guidelines shall be reviewed no later than [3] years
after the entry into force of this instrument with a view to
consider [elaborating a more comprehensive binding regime on civil
liability] [making them binding], in the light of experience
gained.
2. Working Towards
Non-Legally Binding Provisions on Civil
Liability |
I. STATE RESPONSIBILITY
(FOR INTERNATIONALLY WRONGFUL ACTS, INCLUDING BREACH OF OBLIGATIONS
OF THE PROTOCOL) |
{For operational and preambular texts, see sub-section I of
section 1.A, above}
{For operational texts, see sub-section II of section 1.A,
above}
III.
DAMAGE |
A. Definition of
damage |
Operational text 1
[1. These rules and procedures apply to damage [resulting from
the transboundary movement of living modified organisms] as
provided for by domestic law.]
[2. For the purposes of these rules and procedures, damage
[resulting from the transboundary movement of living modified
organisms] as provided for by domestic law may, inter alia,
include:
(a) Damage to the conservation and sustainable use of biological
diversity not redressed through the administrative approach {For
operational texts, see sub-section III.A of section 1.A,
above};
(b) Damage to human health, including loss of life and personal
injury;
(c) Damage to or impaired use of or loss of property;
(d) Loss of income and other economic loss [resulting from
damage to the conservation or sustainable use of biological
diversity];
[(e) Loss of or damage to cultural, social and spiritual values,
or other loss or damage to indigenous or local communities, or loss
of or reduction of food security.]]
Operational text 2
[1. Damage [resulting from the transboundary movement of living
modified organisms] [shall][should] be valued in accordance with
domestic laws and procedures, including factors such as:]
(a) The costs of response measures [in accordance with domestic
law and [procedures] [regulations]];
[(b) The costs of loss of income related to the damage during
the restoration period or until the compensation is provided;]
[(c) The costs and expenses arising from damage to human health
including appropriate medical treatment and compensation for
impairment, disability and loss of life;]
[(d) The costs and expenses arising from damage to cultural,
social and spiritual values, including compensation for damage to
the lifestyles of indigenous and/or local communities.]
2. In the case of centres of origin and/or genetic diversity,
their unique value should be considered in the valuation of damage,
including incurred costs of investment.
3. For the purposes of these rules and procedures, response
measures are reasonable actions to:
(i) [Prevent,] minimize or contain damage, as appropriate;
[(ii) Restore to the condition that existed before the damage or
the nearest equivalent, by the replacement of the loss by other
components of the biological diversity at the same location or for
the same use or at another location or for another type of
use.]]
Operational text 3
A causal link between the damage and the activity in question as
well as the related allocation of the burden of proof to either the
claimant or the respondent needs to be established in accordance
with domestic law.
IV. PRIMARY
COMPENSATION SCHEME |
A. Civil liability
(harmonization of rules and procedures) |
Operational text 4
Parties [may][shall][should] have civil liability rules and
procedures for damage [resulting from the transboundary movement of
living modified organisms] in accordance with domestic law. Parties
[should consider the inclusion of][shall include][may include] the
following [minimum] elements and procedures.
1. Standard of
liability and channelling of liability |
Operational text 5
[The standard of liability, whether fault-based liability,
strict liability or mitigated strict liability, needs to be
established in accordance with domestic law.]
Option 1: Strict liability
Operational text 6
[The operator [shall][should] be liable for damage [under these
rules and procedures][resulting from transport, transit, handling
and/or use of living modified organisms that finds its origin in
such movements], regardless of any fault on his part.]
{For operational texts on "operator", see sub-section IV.A of
section 1.A, above}
Option 2: Mitigated strict liability
Operational text 7
[1. A fault-based standard of liability [shall][should][may] be
used except a strict liability standard [should][shall] be used in
cases [such as] where[:]
[(a) a risk-assessment has identified a living modified organism
as ultra-hazardous; and/or]
[(b) acts or omissions in violation of national law have
occurred; and/or]
[(c) violation of the written conditions of any approval has
occurred.]
2. In cases where a fault-based standard of liability is
applied, liability [shall][should] be channeled to the [entity
having operational control][operator] of the activity that is
proven to have caused the damage, and to whom intentional,
reckless, or negligent acts or omissions can be attributed.
3. In cases where a strict liability standard has been
determined to be applicable, pursuant to paragraph 1 above,
liability shall be channeled to the [entity that has operational
control][operator] over the activity that is proven to have caused
the damage.]
Option 3: Fault-based liability
Operational text 8
[In a civil liability system, liability is established where a
person:
(a) Has operational control of the relevant activity;
(b) Has breached a legal duty of care through intentional,
reckless or negligent conduct, including acts or omissions;
[(c) Such breach has resulted in actual damage to biological
diversity; and]
(d) Causation is established in accordance with section [] of
these rules.]
2. The provision of
interim relief |
Operational text 9
Any competent court or tribunal may issue an injunction or
declaration or take such other appropriate interim or other measure
as may be necessary or desirable with respect to any damage or
imminent threat of damage.
A bis. Additional
elements of civil liability |
1. Exemptions or
mitigation |
Operational text 10
[Domestic law may provide for] exemptions or mitigations [that]
may be invoked by the operator in the case of strict liability.
Exemptions or mitigations [may be][are] based on [any one or more
elements of] the following [exhaustive] list:
(a) Act of God or force majeure;
(b) Act of war or civil unrest;
[(c) Intervention by a third party [that caused damage despite
the fact that appropriate safety measures were in place];]
[(d) Compliance with compulsory measures imposed by a public
authority;]
[(d alt) A specific order imposed by a public authority on the
operator and the implementation of such order caused the
damage;]
[(e) An activity expressly authorized by and fully in conformity
with an authorization given under domestic law;]
[(f) An activity not considered likely to cause environmental
damage according to the state of scientific and technical knowledge
at the time when the activity was carried out;]
[(g) National security exceptions [or international
security];]
[(h) Where the operator could not have reasonably foreseen the
damage.]
2. Recourse against
third party by the person who is liable on the basis of strict
liability |
Operational text 11
These rules and procedures do not limit or restrict any right of
recourse or indemnity that an operator may have against any other
person.
3. Joint and several
liability or apportionment of liability |
Operational text 12
In case two or more operators have caused the damage, joint and
several liability or apportionment of liability may, as
appropriate, apply in accordance with domestic law.
Operational text 12 alt
1. If two or more operators [are][may be] liable according to
these rules and procedures, the claimant [should][shall] have the
right to seek full compensation for the damage from any or all such
operators, i.e., may be liable jointly and severally [without
prejudice] [in addition][subject] to domestic laws providing for
the rights of contribution or recourse.
2. If damage results from an incident that consists of a
continuous occurrence, all operators involved successively in
exercising the control of the activity during that occurrence shall
be jointly and severally liable. However, the operator who proves
that the occurrence during the period when he was exercising the
control of the activity caused only a part of the damage shall be
liable for that part of the damage only.
[3. If damage results from an incident that consists of a series
of occurrences having the same origin, the operators at the time of
any such occurrence shall be jointly and severally liable. However,
any operator who proves that the occurrence at the time when he was
exercising the control of the activity caused only a part of the
damage shall be liable for that part of the damage only.]
4. Where the claim for damage has not been satisfied, the
unsatisfied portion shall be fulfilled by any other person[,
identified by the operator,] whose activity has contributed to the
occurrence of the damage resulting from the transboundary
movement.
4. Limitation of
liability |
a. Limitation in time (relative time limit and absolute
time limit)
Operational text 13
Domestic law may provide for relative and/or absolute time
limits for the submission of claims in the case of civil
liability[, provided that such limits shall not be less than:
(a) [three] years from the date the claimant knew or reasonably
could have known of the damage and its origin; and/or
(b) [fifteen] years from the date of the occurrence of the
damage].
b. Limitation in amount
Operational text 14
[Domestic law may provide for financial limits for strict
liability[, provided that such limits shall not be less than [z]
special drawing rights].]
Operational text 15
1. [Parties may[, consistent with international
[law][obligations],] require the operator to establish and
maintain, during the period of the time limit of liability,
financial security, including through self-insurance.]
2. [Parties are urged to take measures to encourage the
development of financial security instruments and markets by the
appropriate economic and financial operators, including financial
mechanisms in case of insolvency, with the aim of enabling
operators to use financial guarantees to cover their
responsibilities under domestic measures implementing these rules
and procedures.]
I. SUPPLEMENTARY
COMPENSATION SCHEME |
A. Residual State
liability |
Operational text 1
[Where a claim for damages has not been satisfied by an
operator, the unsatisfied portion of that claim shall be fulfilled
by the State where the operator is domiciled or resident.]
Operational text 1 alt
[For damage resulting from transboundary movement of living
modified organisms, primary liability shall be that of the operator
with residual state liability [to the state of the operator]].
B. Supplementary
collective compensation arrangements |
Operational text 1
1. Where the costs of response measures to redress damage to the
conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity have not
been redressed by the primary compensation scheme (administrative
approach) or by any other applicable supplementary compensation
scheme, additional and supplementary compensation measures aimed at
ensuring adequate and prompt compensation may be taken.
2. These measures may include a supplementary collective
compensation arrangement whose terms of reference will be decided
upon by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the
Parties.
3. Parties, other Governments as well as governmental,
intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, the private
sector and other sources will be invited to contribute to such
supplementary collective compensation arrangement in accordance
with their national capacity to contribute.
Operational text 1 alt
No provision
OR
The Parties may consider the necessity of any solidarity
arrangement for cases of damage which are not redressed through the
primary compensation scheme in light of the experience gained
through the implementation of the rules set out in this
document.
Operational text 1
Civil law procedures should be available at the domestic level
to settle claims for damage between claimants and defendants. In
cases of transboundary disputes, the general rules of private
international law will apply as appropriate. The competent
jurisdiction is generally identified on the basis of the
[defendants' domicile] [place where the damage occurred].
Alternative grounds of jurisdiction may be provided for
well-defined cases according to national legislation, e.g. in
relation to the place where a harmful event occurred. Special rules
for jurisdiction may also be laid down for specific matters, e.g.
relating to insurance contracts.
Operational text 1 alt
All matters of substance or procedure regarding claims before
the competent court which are not specifically regulated in these
rules and procedures shall be governed by the law of that court,
including any rules of such law relating to conflict of laws, in
accordance with generally accepted principles of law.
Operational text 1 second alt
No provision
B. Special tribunal
(e.g. Permanent Court of Arbitration Optional Rules for Arbitration
of Disputes Relating to Natural Resources and/or the
Environment) |
Operational text 2
Resorting to special tribunals, such as the Permanent Court of
Arbitration and its Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes
Relating to Natural Resources and/or the Environment, may be
considered in specific cases such as when a large number of victims
are affected.
Operational text 2 alt
Parties may also avail dispute settlement through
civil/administrative procedures and special tribunals such as the
Permanent Court of Arbitration's Optional Rules for the Arbitration
of Disputes relating to Natural Resources and/or the
Environment.
Operational text 2 second alt
In the event of a dispute between persons claiming for damage
pursuant to these rules and procedures and persons liable under
these rules and procedures, and where agreed by both or all
parties, the dispute may be submitted to [final and binding]
arbitration [in accordance with] [including through] the Permanent
Court of Arbitration Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes
Relating to Natural Resources and/or the Environment including in
specific cases such as when a large number of victims are
affected.
Operational text 2 third alt
No provision.
C. Standing/Right to
bring claims |
Operational text 3 (civil liability)
1. Subject to domestic law, Parties should provide for a right
to bring claims by [affected] natural and legal persons [with a
legal interest in the matter] [, including those with an interest
in [the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity]
[environmental [and socio-economic] matters and meeting relevant
requirements under domestic law]]. Those persons should have access
to remedies in the State of export that are no less prompt,
adequate and effective than those available to victims that suffer
damage from the same incident within the territory of that
State.
2. States should guarantee appropriate access to information
relevant for the pursuance of remedies, including claims for
compensation.
Operational text 3 alt (civil liability)
All matters of substance or procedure regarding claims before
the competent court which are not specifically regulated in these
rules and procedures [shall][should] be governed by the law of that
court, including any rules of such law relating to conflict of
laws, in accordance with generally accepted principles of law.
Operational text 4 (administrative approach)
[Natural and legal persons[, including [those] non-governmental
organizations promoting environmental protection and meeting
relevant requirements under domestic law,] should have a right to
[require][request] the competent authority to act according to
[domestic law, or in the absence thereof,] these rules and
procedures [and to challenge], through a review procedure, the
competent authority's decisions, acts or omissions as appropriate
under domestic law.]
III. COMPLEMENTARY
CAPACITY BUILDING MEASURES |
Operational text 1 (to decision)
Invites Parties to take into account, as appropriate, in the
next review of the Updated Action Plan for Building Capacities for
the Effective Implementation of the Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety, as contained in the annex to decision BS-III/3, these
rules and procedures by (a) considering notions, such as
"contributions in kind", "model legislation", or "packages of
capacity building measures", and (b) including capacity building
measures, such as the provision of assistance in the implementation
and application of these rules and procedures, including assistance
to (i) develop national liability rules and procedures, (ii) foster
inter-sectoral coordination and partnership among regulatory organs
at the national level, (iii) ensure [appropriate][effective] public
participation, and (iv) enhance the skills of the judiciary in
handling issues pertaining to liability and redress.
Operational text 2
1. Recognizing the crucial importance of building capacities in
biosafety, the Parties are encouraged to strengthen their efforts
in implementing relevant COP-MOP decisions on capacity building
under Article 22 of the Biosafety Protocol.
2. Parties are invited to take into account the present rules
and procedures in formulating bilateral, regional and multilateral
assistance to developing country Parties that are in the process of
developing their domestic legislation relating to rules and
procedures in the field of liability and redress for damage
resulting from transboundary movements of living modified
organisms.
Operational text 3 (to decision)
The COP-MOP decides that, under the COP-MOP's overall guidance,
[the Parties shall cooperate in the development and/or
strengthening of human resources and institutional capacities
related to liability and redress on the Cartagena Protocol on
Biosafety, including through existing global, regional, subregional
and national institutions and organizations and, as appropriate,
through facilitating private sector involvement.][activities
performed by experts selected from the roster of experts may
include, upon request of the interested Party, the provision of
advice:] [the Committee has the following functions:]
(a) Parties on their domestic legislation in draft or existing
form;
(b) Capacity building workshops on legal issues relating to
liability and redress;
(c) [Identification of best practices related to national
legislation on liability and redress;]
(d) [Support to national capacity's self-assessment
activities;]
(e) [Advice on providers of adequate technology and procedures
to access it].